Billy Collins is a famous American poet, known for his poetry’s comforting themes and ease of comprehension. He originally studied traditional poetry forms, but he changed his objective to experiment with more modern poetry. This poem is a perfect example of this change; the poem is literally a sonnet about the sonnet form’s futility, both mocking and trivializing the traditional rules involved in writing a Shakespearean or Petrarchan sonnet. Through his refusal to conform to these long-held poetic norms, Collins leaves the reader with the theme of living and loving in the moment instead of wasting time satisfying rules that limit one’s ability to express love.
“Sonnet” can be split into three main sections: lines 1-4, 5-8, and 9-14. Each section helps to develop a vital part of the theme, and by the end of the poem they work together to create its meaning.
In lines 1-4, Collins acknowledges the basic premises of a traditional sonnet, writing, “All we need is fourteen lines, well, thirteen now, and after this next one just a dozen”. These lines may seem useless – obviously there will only be a certain number of lines left, there is no need to count them down – but Collins does this for a reason. He counts down the lines, starting from 14, to put the idea in the reader’s mind that the sonnet is finite and structured to end on a designated line, without leaving room for variation from this “set in stone” length. By opening like this, Collins speaks to the rigidity of the sonnet form so that he can later juxtapose it with his own “rules”. The next two lines read, “to launch a little ship on love’s storm-tossed seas, then only ten more left like rows of beans.” Collins mentions a little ship on “love’s storm tossed seas”, equating it to the act of trying to write a sonnet. This metaphor implies that just as a ship is miniscule and difficult to maneuver on the vast ocean, a tightly-regulated sonnet about love is so small compared to the vast and emotional topic of love that it is infinitesimal in comparison and ineffective. Collins then compares the lines of a sonnet, 10 left now, to “rows of beans”. If you’ve ever driven past a farm cultivating soybeans, which are actually quite common, you’ll notice that while each individual plant varies a little from another, they are all essentially the same and repeat over and over without any variation. Collins thinks sonnet lines are like bean rows; sure there’s a little variation, but they’re really all the same. The content stays the same each time and is nothing but monotonous. This first section of the poem is about the typical conventions of a Sonnet and how they are monotonous and futile.
In lines 5-8, Collins continues with a second quatrain. He writes, “How easily it goes unless you get Elizabethan and insist the iambic bongos must be played,” referencing a traditional Elizabethan (Shakespearean) sonnet’s iambic pentameter, which Collins calls the “iambic bongos”. This implies that Collins believes iambs, like bongos, only serve the purpose of giving a poem rhythm. Collins then writes, “and rhymes positioned at the ends of lines, one for every station of the cross.” Another convention of Shakspearean sonnets is the rhyme scheme; each line has to end in a specific rhyme aligning with the ABAB CDCD EFEF GG rhyme scheme of Shakespearean sonnets. Collins mentions each rhyme matches up to every “station of the cross”. This is likely an allusion to the 14 Stations of the Cross, a collection of depictions of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection. Collins uses this since there are 14 lines in a sonnet, just like the 14 Stations, so they match up numerically. Another reason Collins may have used this allusion is that both Shakespeare and Petrarch, the two most famous sonnet-writers and after whom the two main sonnet forms are named, were Christians; Petrarch a devout Catholic and Shakespeare an active Protestant. Just like the “rows of beans” example, the stations of the cross are essentially the same image but just slightly altered each time. Each of them includes different scenes of Jesus’ life, but they are all of Jesus and there is little variation from start to end. Regardless of religion, this allusion also reaffirms the hard number 14 that the sonnet cannot surpass due to the strictness of its form. Overall, this second section of the poem further expresses Collins’ resentment of the Sonnet form and elaborates on the vanity of the sonnet’s tight rules.
The last section of the poem, including the third quatrain and the final couplet, begins with a shift in the poem: “But hang on here while we make the turn into the final six where all will be resolved, where longing and heartache will find an end,”. In Petrarchan sonnets, Petrarch almost always included a shift, or turning point, at line 9 that usually changed/enhanced the poem’s meaning. Collins here intends to do the same, pausing his complaints to find a resolution to his “sonnet”‘s troubled beginning. He writes, “where Laura will tell Petrarch to put down his pen, take off those crazy medieval tights, blow out the lights, and come at last to bed.” For context, Laura was Petrarch’s wife and muse for over 300 of his sonnets. Petrarch certainly lacked no motivation to write his love sonnets, but Collins takes this love further than the page; using Laura as Petrarch’s motivation, Collins writes of a fictional situation in which Laura tells Petrarch to stop writing, take off his crazy (and iconic) tights, and finally go to bed with her. The message behind this closing scene is that sometimes it’s best to “take off those crazy medieval tights” and spend more time with the things you actually love, rather than just writing about them. Collins argues that it is better to show love through deeds than through words.
Petrarch’s medieval tights represent the strictness of the sonnet form; Petrarch taking them off and going to bed with Laura represents freeing oneself from inflexible and monotonous poetic standards to write freely. Collins does this himself throughout the poem, refusing to use iambic pentameter or any form of a rhyme scheme, which are arguably the most annoying and strictest parts of writing a traditional sonnet. In summary, Collins creates the theme of living and loving in the moment rather than wasting time on things that limit one’s ability to express love by introducing the firm, boring, and nonsensical rules of a sonnet, and then juxtaposing it with a situation where those rules are taken away and one can express their love freely.